Welcome Guest | Register for Email Newsletter | Member Benefits

Local Weather Forecast
Today:
Current:69
Sunday:
92/70
Monday:
91/71
Complete Forecast for  Sep 07 2008

Error on line 14 position 1: The operation timed out



Sunday, September 7, 2008

Reader Responses

Posted on Monday, June 09, 2008
Email This   Print This   
Readers Divided On Issue Of Allowing Concealed Weapons In Parks
Editor's Note: Comments this week are on the topic: Do you think the Department of Interior should adopt a proposed rule to allow visitors in some national parks, wildlife refugees and monuments to carry loaded, concealed weapons?


LONG OVERDUE
The Feds are long overdue in restoring the Constitutional right of the Second Amendment to citizens visiting the parks.

It's obvious that the honest, well-meaning visitors will be safer if more of them have access to weapons of defense. In any location, the "bad" guys always have their weapons, because the only meaning to them of gun regulation laws is that it makes them safer from the good guys.

In any cities and countries where repressive gun laws have been enacted, violent crimes have dramatically increased, because the populace is left easy prey to the armed perpetrator.

This is a very elementary concept that all rational people should be able to appreciate.

Gary Jorgensen
Canton


LET THEM CARRY
I strongly believe that properly trained and licensed persons should be allowed to carry their guns in national parks. As for the opposition who thinks it will ruin the family environment of the parks what they should know is, their family friendly shopping malls and grocery stores are already being frequented by law abiding licensed concealed carry patrons. That is what keeps the unlicensed carriers at bay. If done properly no one will ever even know they are carrying anyway. And as far as the fact of "little crime" in the parks ... one crime is too many especially if it is perpetrated against you. It's like the definition of minor surgery...

Laws against carrying a weapon will not stop a criminal from carrying a weapon only a law abiding citizen, so why do we need laws to prevent carrying weapons by licensed trained law abiding citizens. Criminals will do it anyway. Who would you prefer to have armed, someone who wishes to do you harm or someone who is there to protect you from that person? The choice is simple from my vantage point.

Let them carry!

J. Mettlen
Tyler


WHY NOT?
Why not!

You have people that carry a badge that use their guns in the wrong way. Why not let the people who want to do what is right have that chance. You can not stop crime. You can spend the rest of the people's money that is not going in their gas tanks and you still won't stop crime.

Face it, if you are going to give a person a license then he should be trusted anywhere.

Sherman Williams Sr.
Tyler

Comment on this article!
Note: You must login or register to post comments. Comments must be approved by Moderator before appearing on the site. Use the links below to login or register.
  FAQFAQ     SearchSearch Forums        Log inLog in      RegisterRegister 
 Topics   Replies  Author  Last Post 
No Comments
New comment »
More Reader Responses
  • September 7: Better Late Than Never
  • September 7: Have The Palins Done Right By Family?
  • September 7: We Know Obama
  • September 7: Writer Was Wrong
  • September 6: America Not Finished
  • September 6: Theft Is Theft
  • September 6: Hyprocrisy Of Left
  • September 6: America Made History
  • September 6: Basic Health Care
  • September 6: Who Needs Experience?
  • September 6: What’s Not Being Said Rings Loudest
  • September 4: Remembering Mrs. Hall
  • September 4: Reader Examines McCain's Credentials
  • September 4: Oil Price Confusion
  • September 4: Human Nature
  • September 4: Drill Now for Future
  • September 3: Disaster Response
  • September 3: Cornyn Fan
  • September 3: Flint Man Believes In Arming Teachers
  • September 3: Empty Gesture
  • Sept. 1: A Law Is A Law
  • Sept. 1: It’s Nonsense
  • Sept. 1: Industry’s Influence
  • Sept. 1: Not Reason Enough
  • Sept. 1: Last Thing We Need
  • August 31: Lesson on Handguns
  • August 31: Michelle’s Speech
  • August 31: Donut Hole Problems
  • August 31: Cornyn Won't Bow
  • August 31: Are We Employing Modern Maginot Line?
  • August 30: Chairs Acted Properly
  • August 30: Bang for School Bucks
  • August 30: Obama's Influences
  • August 30: ETexan Cites McCain POW Experiences
  • August 29: Forde On Target
  • August 29: Missing Ideas
  • August 29: Character
  • August 29: Who Was First?
  • August 29: Reader Remains Unhappy With Choices
  • August 28: Aneurysm, Plagiarism
  • August 28: Obama Not Qualified
  • August 28: A Shame
  • August 28: Water Department Seeks Additional Income
  • August 28: Missing Ideas
  • August 27: Not Demonizing
  • August 27: Issue Of Trust
  • August 27: End Frustration With Unwanted Candidates
  • August 27: Better, But Bad
  • Aug. 25: Simply Ludicrous
  • Aug. 25: Grading Problem
  • Aug. 25: Would Be Disservice
  • Aug. 25: A Sure Winner
  • August 24: Why Vote Democrat?
  • August 24: Super Stamp Combo
  • August 24: Reading Problem
  • August 24: Know Your Candidates
  • August 23: Protect Nature During Tyler Growth
  • August 23: Highly Disturbing
  • August 23: Feeling The Pain
  • August 23: American Empire Over
  • August 22: Not Qualified
  • August 22: No Humor In Stealing
  • August 22: Can Sugar Sweeten Energy Future?
  • August 22: Has Finest Hour
  • August 22: Abortion Differences
  • August 21: Viewpoints Varied In U.S. Energy Muddle
  • August 21: Truly Dismayed
  • August 21: Choices Open
  • August 21: The Spectators
  • Aug. 18: Unwelcome Impact
  • Aug. 18: Ethanol a Joke
  • Aug. 18: Cut Ethanol Mandate
  • Aug. 18: Bad Public Policy
  • Aug. 18: The Wrong Thing
  • Aug. 18: Ignore Evidence
  • August 17: VALUE OUR VOTE
  • August 17: SCHOOL SAFETY
  • August 17: ENERGY INDEPENDENCE
  • August 17: Chairman Explains Constable Selection
  • August 16: Writer Wants Pelosi To Relinquish Post
  • August 16: Taxes Pay Way
  • August 16: A Responsibility
  • August 16: Sidewalk Use
  • August 15: Together
  • August 15: Right To Elect
  • August 15: More Sidewalks Needed For Tylerites
  • August 15: Least Qualified
  • August 15: Amazing
  • August 15: 'Economic Justice'
  • August 14: Vigilance Important
  • August 14: Trial For Terrorist
  • August 14: Reader Notes Obama's Lack Of Experience
  • August 13: Refinery Issue
  • August 13: Intelligence Reports
  • August 13: First In Line
  • August 13: Direction Important
  • August 13: Clearing Up Record On East Texas Caddos
  • Aug. 11: Out of Bounds
  • Aug. 11: Remember, It's L.A.
  • Aug. 11: Loss of Liberty
  • News |  Sports |  Business |  Opinion |  Features |  Food |  |  Arts & Entertainment |  Religion |  FAQ
    Contact Us |  Who We Are |  About Us |  Print Services |  Tyler Paper Jobs | 
    Copyright Policy |  Privacy Policy |  Authorized Use Agreement |  Terms & Conditions of Use