Welcome Guest | Register for Email Newsletter | Member Benefits

Local Weather Forecast
Today:
Current:77
Friday:
92/71
Saturday:
93/73
Complete Forecast for  Aug 21 2008


Thursday, August 21, 2008

Reader Responses

Posted on Monday, June 09, 2008
Email This   Print This   
Readers Divided On Issue Of Allowing Concealed Weapons In Parks
Editor's Note: Comments this week are on the topic: Do you think the Department of Interior should adopt a proposed rule to allow visitors in some national parks, wildlife refugees and monuments to carry loaded, concealed weapons?


LONG OVERDUE
The Feds are long overdue in restoring the Constitutional right of the Second Amendment to citizens visiting the parks.

It's obvious that the honest, well-meaning visitors will be safer if more of them have access to weapons of defense. In any location, the "bad" guys always have their weapons, because the only meaning to them of gun regulation laws is that it makes them safer from the good guys.

In any cities and countries where repressive gun laws have been enacted, violent crimes have dramatically increased, because the populace is left easy prey to the armed perpetrator.

This is a very elementary concept that all rational people should be able to appreciate.

Gary Jorgensen
Canton


LET THEM CARRY
I strongly believe that properly trained and licensed persons should be allowed to carry their guns in national parks. As for the opposition who thinks it will ruin the family environment of the parks what they should know is, their family friendly shopping malls and grocery stores are already being frequented by law abiding licensed concealed carry patrons. That is what keeps the unlicensed carriers at bay. If done properly no one will ever even know they are carrying anyway. And as far as the fact of "little crime" in the parks ... one crime is too many especially if it is perpetrated against you. It's like the definition of minor surgery...

Laws against carrying a weapon will not stop a criminal from carrying a weapon only a law abiding citizen, so why do we need laws to prevent carrying weapons by licensed trained law abiding citizens. Criminals will do it anyway. Who would you prefer to have armed, someone who wishes to do you harm or someone who is there to protect you from that person? The choice is simple from my vantage point.

Let them carry!

J. Mettlen
Tyler


WHY NOT?
Why not!

You have people that carry a badge that use their guns in the wrong way. Why not let the people who want to do what is right have that chance. You can not stop crime. You can spend the rest of the people's money that is not going in their gas tanks and you still won't stop crime.

Face it, if you are going to give a person a license then he should be trusted anywhere.

Sherman Williams Sr.
Tyler

Comment on this article!
Note: You must login or register to post comments. Comments must be approved by Moderator before appearing on the site. Use the links below to login or register.
  FAQFAQ     SearchSearch Forums        Log inLog in      RegisterRegister 
 Topics   Replies  Author  Last Post 
No Comments
New comment »
More Reader Responses
  • August 21: Viewpoints Varied In U.S. Energy Muddle
  • August 21: Truly Dismayed
  • August 21: Choices Open
  • August 21: The Spectators
  • Aug. 18: Unwelcome Impact
  • Aug. 18: Ethanol a Joke
  • Aug. 18: Cut Ethanol Mandate
  • Aug. 18: Bad Public Policy
  • Aug. 18: The Wrong Thing
  • Aug. 18: Ignore Evidence
  • August 17: VALUE OUR VOTE
  • August 17: SCHOOL SAFETY
  • August 17: ENERGY INDEPENDENCE
  • August 17: Chairman Explains Constable Selection
  • August 16: Writer Wants Pelosi To Relinquish Post
  • August 16: Taxes Pay Way
  • August 16: A Responsibility
  • August 16: Sidewalk Use
  • August 15: Together
  • August 15: Right To Elect
  • August 15: More Sidewalks Needed For Tylerites
  • August 15: Least Qualified
  • August 15: Amazing
  • August 15: 'Economic Justice'
  • August 14: Vigilance Important
  • August 14: Trial For Terrorist
  • August 14: Reader Notes Obama's Lack Of Experience
  • August 13: Refinery Issue
  • August 13: Intelligence Reports
  • August 13: First In Line
  • August 13: Direction Important
  • August 13: Clearing Up Record On East Texas Caddos
  • Aug. 11: Out of Bounds
  • Aug. 11: Remember, It's L.A.
  • Aug. 11: Loss of Liberty
  • Aug. 11: Government Control
  • August 10: POST WARNING
  • August 10: LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES
  • August 10: Dilemma Causes Fear In Whitehouse
  • August 10: BACKGROUND CHECKS
  • August 9: Out Of Proportion
  • August 9: In Response
  • August 9: Comparisons
  • August 9: Bush Should Bring Congress Off Vacation
  • August 7: Need To Be United
  • August 7: Let's Be Clear On Reason For Drilling
  • August 7: Coming To America
  • August 7: At Home Worship?
  • August 6: Zimbabwe Currency
  • August 6: Reader Believes Gas Rationing Needed
  • August 6: Appealing Plan
  • August 6: In Response
  • Readers Don't Want Local Governments Operating Broadband Internet Systems
  • Aug. 4: No ' Red Tape? '
  • Aug. 4: An Obama Fan
  • Aug. 4: Why Not Both?
  • Aug. 4: Reciting Pledge
  • Aug. 4: Judge Justice Making Texas Sanctuary State
  • August 3: Yes To County's Bare-Bones Jail Plan
  • August 3: Some 'What Ifs'
  • August 3: Judges Do Their Jobs
  • August 3: Burning Question
  • August 2: Three Great Myths About Higher Education
  • August 2: Health Care Crisis
  • August 2: Change To What?
  • August 2: War Already 'Won'
  • August 1: Rig Activity Decline
  • August 1: Electoral College Misunderstood Element
  • August 1: Security Major Concern For Courthouse
  • July 31: Regarding Taxes
  • July 31: Matter Of Taste
  • July 31: Arbitrary Rulings Should Be Appealed
  • July 30: Unbelievable Story
  • July 30: Tips His Hat
  • July 30: Reject Merger Of Search Engine Giants
  • July 30: Highway Trust Funds
  • July 28: Windy Fast Track
  • July 28: Rational Thought
  • July 28: Church and State
  • July 28: Taxpayers' Dime?
  • July 28: Reader Sees Judges' Responses as Out of Line
  • July 27: Think Out Of Box
  • July 27: Senior's Ability
  • July 27: Let's Toss 'Em All Out, Good And Bad
  • July 27: Christian Involvement
  • July 27: Apathy Worst Enemy
  • As You See It: Should Governments Operate Internet Access?
  • July 26: Lack Of Energy Plan Jeopardizes America
  • July 26: In Response
  • July 26: Full Attention
  • July 25: Reader Examines Beginning Of Oil Use
  • July 25: On Free Inquiry
  • July 25: Has Concern
  • July 24: Obama On Arms
  • July 24: Negative List
  • July 24: How Much Of Your Money Is Safe?
  • July 23: Time To Speak Out
  • July 23: Obama Statement Irritates Tyler Reader
  • July 23: No Divided Allegiance
  • July 23: Disappointed
  • News |  Sports |  Business |  Opinion |  Features |  Food |  |  Arts & Entertainment |  Religion |  FAQ
    Contact Us |  Who We Are |  About Us |  Print Services |  Tyler Paper Jobs | 
    Copyright Policy |  Privacy Policy |  Authorized Use Agreement |  Terms & Conditions of Use