Welcome Guest | Register for Email Newsletter | Member Benefits

Local Weather Forecast
Today:
Current:75
Friday:
95/75
Saturday:
96/74
Complete Forecast for  Jul 24 2008

Top Jobs

Top Homes

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Tyler

Posted on Thursday, May 22, 2008
Email This   Print This   
Back To The Deadly Science Of Grammar
Some months ago The New York Times expressed an unusually astute editorial opinion. Said the Times: "Nobody wants some sicko drilling a peephole in their locker room."

In their locker room?

Four months later, the Times was relieved by a report discounting the threat of nuclear weapons in Iran. Even so, "The new report is not an argument for anyone to let down their guard when it comes to Iran's nuclear ambitions." Let down their guard?

Yes, we're back today to that dismal science, grammar. The question nags at every serious writer. How do we handle referent pronouns? The clumsy things won't behave. They flop around in our prose like wet dogs on a kitchen floor.

Last month the head of the Federal Aviation Administration made a reassuring statement: "We will take action against anybody who violates their obligation ..." In The Seattle Times, an education reporter spoke of a decision-making process that isn't complete "until everybody has said their piece."

This past September I heard from David Short, a retired teacher who formerly taught English at the ninth-grade level. He is of the old school: "I always taught my students that in antecedal constructions, the 'one's' and 'body's' were always singular, e.g., 'Everybody left HIS jacket on the bus."' He asks, "Was I right?"

On this recurring question, the Times' stylebook is unequivocal: It lines up the usual suspects - anybody, anyone, everybody, everyone, no one and someone - and decrees: "Each of these pronouns is singular and requires 'he' or 'she' (never 'they') on further reference. Thus, 'Has anybody lost HIS ticket?'''

In its sometimes disappointing way, The Associated Press Stylebook ducks the issue. So, too, with the eminent Henry Fowler in his Modern English Usage. Fowler's inheritor, R.W. Burchfield, gently waffles. He says the indefinite pronouns "are now frequently, though somewhat controversially, followed by such plural pronouns as 'they' or 'their.''' Burchfield goes on to say: "Popular usage and historical precedent favor the use of a plural pronoun in such contexts, but many writers prefer to use 'he' or 'he or she.'''

What about it? I would love to hear from editors, authors, speechwriters and serious readers (God bless you) and will report your consensus.

Comment on this article!
Note: You must login or register to post comments. Comments must be approved by Moderator before appearing on the site. Use the links below to login or register.
  FAQFAQ     SearchSearch Forums        Log inLog in      RegisterRegister 
 Topics   Replies  Author  Last Post 
No Comments
New comment »
More Tyler Stories
News |  Sports |  Business |  Opinion |  Features |  Food |  |  Arts & Entertainment |  Religion |  FAQ
Contact Us |  Who We Are |  About Us |  Print Services |  Tyler Paper Jobs | 
Copyright Policy |  Privacy Policy |  Authorized Use Agreement |  Terms & Conditions of Use